Independent Comparison

A Spider AF Alternative That Starts at $39, Not $150

Spider AF publishes its prices, which makes this an easy comparison to do honestly. The question is whether its entry tier is priced for an account your size.

βœ“ No credit card required Β· Setup in minutes Β· Cancel anytime

Spider AF is a Japanese ad-fraud platform covering click fraud, fake leads, affiliate fraud and third-party tag monitoring. Unusually for this category it publishes its prices, so you can compare before talking to anyone. That also makes the gap easy to state: its cheapest plan is $150/month and there is no free tier.

The problem

Spider AF's tiers are built around click volume: $150/month covers up to 500,000 clicks a month, and the next step up is $990/month. If your account is nowhere near half a million paid clicks a month, you would be buying an allowance sized for someone else and paying the entry price for the privilege. Evaluation is a 14-day trial, so there is no way to keep watching your traffic for free once it ends.

Feature comparison

Didva vs Spider AF at a glance

Competitor details from public pages, as of August 2026. Confirm current terms with the vendor.

Feature Didva Spider AF
Entry price
$120/month if billed annually. The next tier, Elite, is $990/month.
$39/month, flat $150/month (Performance)
Free option Free tier, no expiry (3,000 clicks/mo, no card) 14-day free trial
Volume model Plan-based click allowance Click-capped tiers β€” 500k, then 1M, then Enterprise
See a price without a sales call
Both publish pricing. Spider AF's Enterprise tier, above 1M clicks/month, is quote-only.
βœ“ βœ“
Ad channels covered today Google Ads, Bing and Meta live Google, Yahoo, Meta, Microsoft and more
Ad spend affects the bill
Spider AF states unlimited ad spend with no spend-based fees; Didva prices on clicks, not spend.
βœ• βœ•

What Spider AF costs, and where the step is

Spider AF publishes three tiers, and the jump between the first two is the thing to look at before anything else:

  • Performance β€” $150/month, or $120/month billed annually. Up to 500,000 clicks a month.
  • Elite β€” $990/month, or $790/month billed annually. Up to 1 million clicks a month.
  • Enterprise β€” custom pricing, above 1 million clicks a month.

Doubling your click allowance costs more than six times as much. Annual billing takes 20% off. Website coverage is unlimited on every tier and ad spend carries no extra fee, which is genuinely better than the percentage-of-spend contracts elsewhere in this category. Figures read from Spider AF's pricing page in August 2026.

Spider AF vs Lunio, since that is the comparison people actually search

These two sit at opposite ends of how ad-fraud tools are sold, which is probably why they get compared rather than either being compared to us.

Spider AF publishes its numbers: $150/month up to 500,000 clicks, $990/month up to a million, custom above that. You know what you will pay before you speak to anyone, and you can check whether your volume fits.

Lunio publishes nothing. Its pricing page is titled "Pricing β€” contact us for your customized plan", and its own FAQ says pricing "is based on a small fraction of your ad spend", quoted per account with channel coverage taken into account. Evaluation is a 14-day traffic audit rather than a product trial.

So the honest split: Spider AF if you want a published number and volume tiers, Lunio if your spend is large enough that a share-of-spend contract makes sense and a sales cycle is acceptable. Lunio also covers more channels today. Both sets of figures were read from the vendors' own pricing pages in August 2026.

Where we fit, and where we do not

Didva is the cheaper end of that spectrum and deliberately narrower: $39/month flat, plus a free tier of 3,000 clicks a month with no card and no expiry, covering Google Ads, Microsoft Bing and Meta. If your paid click volume is nowhere near half a million a month, Spider AF's entry tier is sized for a different problem than yours.

Where Spider AF is the better answer: fake-lead scoring and affiliate-fraud detection as separate products, third-party tag monitoring, and coverage that includes Yahoo. If those are what you are shopping for, this is not a close comparison β€” buy the tool that does them.

The cheapest way to find out

You do not have to choose from pricing pages. Spider AF's trial runs 14 days; Didva's free tier does not run out. Start the free plan, leave it collecting on your own traffic, and take Spider AF's trial whenever you are ready to compare two weeks of the same traffic side by side.

After a full billing cycle you will have the only two numbers that settle it: what each tool actually flagged on your traffic, and what each would cost at your real click volume.

How it works

Track β†’ Score β†’ Block β†’ Report β†’ Optimize

A closed loop that turns raw paid clicks into clean, defensible traffic data.

  1. 1

    Count your monthly paid clicks

    Spider AF's entry tier allows 500,000. Check how far under that you are.

  2. 2

    Decide what you are protecting

    Just paid clicks, or also lead forms, affiliate traffic and third-party tags?

  3. 3

    Compare published numbers

    Both Spider AF and Didva publish prices, so this comparison needs no sales call.

  4. 4

    Start free, no clock

    Watchtower has no 14-day limit and no credit card requirement.

  5. 5

    Compare on your own data

    Run Didva alongside any trial and see what each one actually catches.

Capabilities

Everything you need to protect paid traffic

Detection, blocking, alerting and clean reporting in one place.

Published, fixed pricing

$39/month flat, not a volume tier sized for enterprise click counts.

Free with no expiry

Watchtower stays free indefinitely, not a 14-day trial window.

Self-serve signup

Start monitoring today without a sales call or a custom quote.

Click-level evidence

See the reason and confidence behind every flagged click.

Manual review queue

Hold borderline traffic for a human decision instead of auto-blocking everything.

CSV + appeal exports

Evidence packs formatted for Google Ads invalid-click refund claims.

Product

See Didva in action

Real-time monitoring, risk scoring and one-click evidence β€” in a single dashboard.

app.didva.com/dashboard
Didva dashboard: live click and conversion overview with fraud-risk distribution
Click stream with per-click risk scoring, device and behavior signals
Every paid click, scored
Blocked IPs with risk reasons and exportable invalid-click evidence
Blocking & evidence
IP detail with risk score, risk factors and exportable click evidence
IP evidence & risk factors
Device fingerprints with multi-IP and click-farm detection
Device & farm detection
Reviews

What advertisers say

Real feedback from teams protecting their paid traffic with Didva.

Caught a click-farm pattern our previous tool missed and cut wasted spend within the first month.
Michael Turner Β· PPC Lead
Setup was a single snippet. The evidence export made our Google Ads refund request painless.
Sarah Mitchell Β· Growth Marketing Manager
Clear per-IP reasons and a review queue so we are not blocking real customers. Exactly what we needed.
David Reynolds Β· Founder
Datacenter and repeat-click detection paid for itself fast. Reporting is clear enough to share with clients.
Jessica Parker Β· Head of Performance
We manage campaigns across several clients and the dashboard quickly highlighted traffic patterns we would have otherwise missed.
Mark Sullivan Β· Agency Owner
Simple setup, useful alerts, and enough detail to investigate suspicious visitors without involving developers.
Emily Carter Β· Founder
The product delivered value quickly. I would like a few more filtering options, but the core detection features work well.
Ryan Foster Β· Performance Marketing Manager
The manual review queue helped us avoid blocking legitimate visitors while still dealing with suspicious traffic.
Ashley Bennett Β· Growth Lead
The IP-level evidence makes client conversations much easier. Instead of assumptions, we can show actual data.
Kevin Brooks Β· PPC Specialist
One of the cleaner interfaces we have used in the ad fraud space. Reports are easy to understand.
Laura Jenkins Β· Marketing Director
Within the first week we found a source of repeated clicks that had been consuming budget for months.
Daniel Hughes Β· Founder
Useful notifications, clear reasoning, and very little noise. Most flagged visits deserved attention.
Megan Turner Β· Head of Acquisition
We mainly wanted better visibility into traffic quality. The platform delivered exactly that.
Jason Reed Β· E-commerce Manager
I like that every flag includes supporting details. It builds confidence in the decisions being made.
Olivia Scott Β· Marketing Operations Lead
We tested several tools and this was the easiest one to explain to both clients and team members.
Nathan Walker Β· Founder
Good balance between automation and transparency. Nothing feels hidden behind a black box.
Rachel Green Β· Growth Marketing Manager
The repeat-click reports helped us identify unusual traffic spikes during a competitor campaign launch.
Tyler Morgan Β· Paid Media Lead
Client reporting became much easier once we started including the exported traffic quality reports.
Sophia Hall Β· Performance Lead
Strong product overall. A few advanced reporting features would be nice, but detection accuracy has been solid.
Ethan Cooper Β· Founder
The value was obvious after the first couple of weeks. We now review suspicious traffic as part of our regular workflow.
Victoria Adams Β· Head of Marketing

Ready to see which clicks are real? Start protecting your paid traffic in minutes.

Start Protecting Your Ads
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Is Didva affiliated with Spider AF?

No. This is an independent comparison to help advertisers evaluate options. Spider AF and all product names belong to their respective owners.

What does Spider AF cost?

Per Spider AF's own pricing page in August 2026: Performance is $150/month ($120 billed annually) for up to 500,000 clicks a month, Elite is $990/month ($790 annually) for up to 1 million, and Enterprise is custom-priced above that. Annual billing saves 20%.

Does Spider AF have a free plan?

No. Evaluation is a 14-day free trial. Didva's Watchtower plan is free with no expiry and no credit card, so monitoring can continue indefinitely.

Which is better, Spider AF or Lunio?

They are sold differently rather than one being better. Spider AF publishes volume-based prices from $150/month; Lunio publishes none and quotes a share of your ad spend, with a 14-day traffic audit to start. Spider AF suits a known click volume and a published number; Lunio suits large multi-channel spend and covers more channels today.

Which ad channels does each tool cover?

Spider AF lists Google, Yahoo, Meta and Microsoft among its core platforms. Didva covers Google Ads, Microsoft Bing and Meta (Facebook and Instagram) live, with Meta on every paid plan.

Didva is an independent product and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Spider AF or Lunio. All product names, logos and trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Spider AF and Lunio pricing and channel coverage are cited from those companies' own public pricing pages as of August 2026 and may have changed; confirm current details directly with the vendor before deciding.

Free traffic audit

See how much of your traffic is real

Tell us your site and we'll show you where invalid clicks are draining your budget.

No credit card. We'll never share your details.

See your own traffic before you pick a tier.

Start free on Watchtower. No 14-day clock, no card, no minimum click volume.